Paid GPT-4 stands out as a more accurate and powerful model compared to Bing Chat and ChatGPT 3.5, especially for academic and logical tasks. While Bing Chat offers live web search and source citations, it demonstrates notable limitations in censorship and performance consistency, whereas ChatGPT 3.5 remains a fast, helpful tool without browsing capabilities.
GPT-4, accessible via OpenAI’s paid subscription, offers a substantial upgrade over previous versions like GPT-3.5. Users consistently report that GPT-4 delivers superior responses, particularly in academic research and logical reasoning. Its outputs feature more accurate references to scientific articles and detailed explanations. Despite lacking real-time web browsing, GPT-4’s knowledge base and reasoning skills surpass those of Bing Chat and GPT-3.5.
Bing Chat integrates GPT-4’s core capabilities with up-to-date internet search results. This feature allows Bing to provide recent information, a clear advantage over GPT-4’s static knowledge. Notably, Bing highlights and cites its sources inline and summarizes citations at the answer’s end. This adding of citations enhances the transparency and credibility of responses, especially useful in research or fact-checking contexts.
However, Bing’s implementation introduces drawbacks that impact user experience. Extensive content filtering causes Bing to refuse certain inquiries, even innocuous science or computer science questions, restricting its usefulness. Furthermore, Bing operates across different modes: Creative, Balanced, and Precise. These modes affect accuracy, as seen in logic tests where Creative mode often gets answers wrong while Precise mode succeeds. Bing’s performance can also degrade over time, surprising users who initially find it impressive.
ChatGPT 3.5 offers speed and customization via custom instructions but lacks browsing functionality. Users appreciate its quick responses and tailored outputs for straightforward use cases. Still, this version falls short in accuracy and detailed referencing, making it less suited for rigorous research compared to GPT-4.
| Feature | Paid GPT-4 | Bing Chat | ChatGPT 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy and Reasoning | High, excellent in logic and academic referencing | Variable; Precise mode accurate, others less so | Moderate; some logical errors |
| Access to Current Information | No live browsing; upcoming plugins planned | Yes, live web search integrated | No browsing |
| Source Citation | Generally none | Inline citations with source links | None |
| Censorship and Content Restrictions | Less censoring than Bing | Heavy filtering; some refusals | Minimal censoring |
| Speed | Moderate | Moderate | Fast |
| Suitability for Programming | Excellent | Good but limited in creative tasks | Good |
Users who require rigorous academic output or complex logical problem solving prefer paid GPT-4 due to its accuracy and detail. In contrast, Bing Chat suits users who value current news or live data with source verification. Bing’s citation feature stands out as a unique strength, lending credibility to its answers.
On the downside, Bing’s overzealous filtering can frustrate users needing unrestricted information. Some modes’ inconsistency further affects reliability. Many users note that Bing’s initial capabilities drop after some use, undermining its initial appeal.
ChatGPT 3.5 still appeals to those prioritizing speed and customization over the latest data or deep accuracy. Its simple interface and fast response times make it suitable for less demanding tasks.
Development continues on all fronts. OpenAI plans to add plugin support to GPT-4, which could improve its access to current information and web data. Google Bard and other AI tools show potential, especially for coding, but currently lag in accuracy and citation features compared to GPT-4 and Bing Chat.
- Paid GPT-4 delivers superior accuracy, logic, and academic referencing.
- Bing Chat offers live web search and unique source citations but suffers from over-censoring and inconsistent accuracy.
- ChatGPT 3.5 lacks browsing but remains fast and useful for simpler tasks.
- User choice depends on needs for accuracy (GPT-4) or real-time info and citations (Bing).
- Upcoming GPT-4 plugins may narrow the gap in accessing current data.
How does paid GPT-4 compare to Bing Chat and ChatGPT?
Paid GPT-4 stands out for accuracy and depth, Bing Chat shines with live web search and citations, and ChatGPT 3.5 remains a fast, instruction-driven tool without browsing capability.
AI tools share a core language engine but differ in implementation. Paid GPT-4, Bing Chat, and ChatGPT 3.5 each serve unique needs. Users must weigh accuracy, up-to-date info, and speed.
Overall Quality and Performance
Users rave that GPT-4 Paid Version is noticeably better. One tester says, “I seriously doubt you’ll be disappointed.”
Its reasoning beats GPT-3.5 easily. Social science research yields richer results on GPT-4. Academic references come through detailed and accurate.
Bing Chat runs GPT-4 under the hood and adds web search. Early impressions thrill some users. Then over-censoring and odd errors surface. One user calls it “dain-bramaged.”
ChatGPT-3.5 still holds value. It offers custom instructions and high speed. Users miss live browsing but praise its simplicity.
Accuracy in a Logic Test
- Test Question: “I have 4 apples today. I ate 3 apples yesterday. How many apples do I have today?”
- GPT-4: Correctly answers 4.
- GPT-3.5: Gives a wrong result.
- Bing Creative Mode: Answers wrong and then argues.
- Bing Balanced Mode: Answers wrong.
- Bing Precise Mode: Answers right.
This simple test highlights GPT-4’s logical strength. Bing’s modes vary in reliability. GPT-3.5 lags without advanced reasoning tweaks.
Use Case Suitability
Programming: GPT-4 often pays for itself. Code suggestions feel spot-on. Debugging and refactoring improve.
Google Bard shows promise in coding. It explains functions clearly but may hallucinate details. GPT-3.5 also handles simple code but can miss nuance.
Research & Academic: GPT-4 excels in social sciences prompts. Articles and references feel accurate and plentiful. Bing yields fewer scholarly sources. ChatGPT-3.5 can’t browse, so it relies on pre-2021 data.
Features and Limitations
- Bing Chat
- Integrates web search for real-time data.
- Provides inline citations and source links.
- Offers Creative, Balanced, and Precise modes.
- Refuses some requests due to strict censoring.
- Experiences occasional bizarre errors or “dain-bramage.”
- GPT-4 Paid/OpenAI
- Lacks live search but plans plugin support soon.
- Delivers detailed academic references.
- Supports custom instructions from GPT-3.5 era.
- Applies moderate content filters but less drastic than Bing.
- Citation and Credibility
- Bing stands out with highlighted sources and links.
- ChatGPT and other GPT-powered tools skip formal citations.
- Citations boost trust and allow fact-checking.
User Preference and Experience
One adopter says, “I’ll stick with my OpenAI Plus account for now.” They cite GPT-4’s power and advanced reasoning.
Another prefers Bing Chat for its up-to-date knowledge and citations. Creative mode outputs rival paid GPT-4 in style tasks but not in scholarly depth.
Critics of Bing warn about limited use after initial bursts. They complain of censored science questions and uneven performance across modes.
Core Summary: GPT (3.5 or 4) is the core language model. ChatGPT and Bing are shells around it. Implementation and prompts decide if outcomes are awesome or worthless.
Key Takeaways
- Accuracy & Depth: Paid GPT-4 beats Bing and GPT-3.5 in logical reasoning and academic work.
- Live Data & Citations: Bing Chat offers real-time search and in-text citations. Great for current events and verification.
- Speed & Simplicity: ChatGPT-3.5 wins on custom instructions and response time. It lacks browsing but stays responsive.
- User Choice: Choose GPT-4 for deep research and coding. Pick Bing for source-linked, up-to-date answers. Lean on GPT-3.5 for fast, guided chats.
Each tool leverages GPT at its core. The final pick depends on your need for accuracy, citations, or speed. And yes, they all have quirks—but they keep getting smarter.
What makes paid GPT-4 better than Bing Chat and ChatGPT 3.5?
Paid GPT-4 delivers more accurate and detailed responses, especially in research and academic contexts. It provides better logical reasoning and references more precise academic articles than Bing Chat or GPT-3.5.
How does Bing Chat’s citation feature compare to GPT-4?
Bing Chat uniquely highlights and cites web sources inline and at the end of responses. This boosts credibility and lets users verify information instantly, a feature not currently available in GPT-4 or ChatGPT.
Why do some users find Bing Chat less reliable despite using GPT-4 core?
Bing Chat faces heavy censoring and refusals on certain questions. Some modes give incorrect answers or argue with users. Its quality can vary over time due to these restrictions.
Is Bing Chat’s up-to-date web search an advantage over paid GPT-4?
Yes, Bing Chat can access and use live web data, providing fresher information. Paid GPT-4 currently lacks real-time browsing but may gain plugins soon for updates.
How do GPT-4 and Bing Chat compare in programming tasks?
Paid GPT-4 is highly valued for programming due to precise and accurate code outputs. Google Bard also excels in coding, while Bing’s creative mode matches GPT-4 for many tasks but may lag in style-specific prompts.
